The busy open newsroom of a major national TV broadcast media house. Vikram, the veteran Chief News Editor, is mentoring Veda, a green journalist who is genuinely interested in understanding how to make decisions with ethics in mind in an industry of pressure-cooker situations. Sowndarawali, a perceptive intern, occasionally injects rational, sensible ideas into the discussion. The context of the discussion rests on a verse from the Bhagavad Gita and draws upon the verse in the context of ethical governance in media.
Veda: Vikram, I’ve been digging into the Bhagavad Gita lately, trying to wrap my head around ethical choices—especially since that whole mess about whether we should run that clickbait story for more views. Everybody keeps banging “Do your duty, forget about the results.” Sure, but is that the only advice the Gita’s got for sticky situations in journalism? I feel like there’s gotta be more.
Vikram: Oh, totally, Veda. The Gita’s basically a goldmine for sorting out moral messes.
Original (Sanskrit):
यद्यदाचरति श्रेष्ठस्तत्तदेवेतरो जनः।
स यत्प्रमाणं कुरुते लोकस्तदनुवर्तते॥
Transliteration:
Yadyadācarati śreṣṭhas tattad evetaro janaḥ,
Sa yat pramāṇaṁ kurute lokaḥ tad anusarati.
Translation:
Whatever a standout person does, everyone else copies. The example a leader sets? That’s what the world runs with.
This one’s basically calling out how the higher-ups—editors, producers, whoever’s steering the ship—are low-key shaping the whole vibe. If we play it straight and stick to our values, it doesn’t just make us look good, it actually nudges everyone else to do the same. No pressure, huh?
Veda: So basically, walk the talk, yeah? But how does that work when we’re smack in the middle of newsroom drama—like, say, deciding if we should drop a story that could trash someone’s reputation but would totally send our ratings through the roof?
Vikram: Bang on. What we do up top, everyone else copies. If we chase headlines and drama instead of facts, we’re pretty much telling everyone that numbers matter more than what’s right. The Gita’s got a thing or two to say about that—act smart, act right, ’cause everyone’s watching. Like, if we air something half-baked, we’re not just risking a lawsuit—we’re torching the trust people have in us. The real question is, are we being fair? Is the story even true? Or are we just hungry for clicks? Our job is to keep it real, basically.
Sowndarawali (jumping in): Wait, gotta say this—remember that time we almost ran with that leaked politician video? It was all over the group chat—super spicy, but we had zero clue about the backstory. If we’d dropped it, we might’ve wrecked someone for nothing and looked like total amateurs. That’s what the verse is warning about, right? Don’t just leap for the shiny headline—think about the fallout.
Vikram: Couldn’t have said it better. That’s exactly it. The Gita’s whole vibe is, chill for a sec, think it through. Ethical leadership isn’t just about dodging lawsuits. It’s making sure our work holds up—whether people poke at it now or years from now. So, Veda, what do you think we actually need in place to keep ourselves honest?
Veda: Honestly? Solid rules, for starters—a code of conduct that doesn’t just sit in a dusty binder, actual protocols for fact-checking, and whistleblower stuff so people aren’t scared to speak up. But, like, how do we make sure people don’t just ignore all that when the next big scoop lands in our lap? Pressure’s real, and sometimes people just… fudge it.
Vikram: That’s the killer question. You can have rules for days, but if nobody cares, what’s the point? The Gita’s verse basically says, if you’re running the ship, you gotta live those standards, not just preach ‘em. Like, if I, as Chief Editor, triple-check every source before we go live, that sets the bar. We should also be doing:
– Regular ethics workshops so nobody forgets what matters.
– Anonymous tip lines, so folks can call out sketchy stuff without worrying about payback.
– Post-show breakdowns to catch our screw-ups and actually learn something.
That’s how you build a culture where people hold each other accountable. But here’s the tricky bit—what if a story is pure gold for ratings, but kinda iffy ethics-wise? What do you do then?
Veda: Oof, that’s a tricky one. Honestly, I’d wanna double-check everything—dig into sources, weigh if the story actually matters or if it’s just fuel for the rumor mill. Like, if we’re exposing some wild corruption? Okay, maybe it’s worth the heat. But if it’s just celeb drama? Nah, I’d fight back. The Gita’s all about doing the right thing even if it’s tough, right? Feels like keeping long-term trust matters way more than chasing a quick headline. Am I thinking straight here?
Vikram: You got it. The Gita’s whole dharma thing basically says: do what’s right, not what’s easy or flashy. In the corporate world, that means being upfront and owning your decisions. Say we pass on a story—if we’re honest about why, people trust us more, simple as that. Sowndarawali, you’ve seen the real mess behind the scenes. Any hacks for dealing with this pressure cooker?
Sowndarawali: For real, it comes down to making ethics just a thing everyone does, not some official rulebook that gathers dust. Like, at my last gig, we had this “stop and check” deal—no one could run with a story unless two sources checked out. Slowed us down sometimes, but hey, it saved us from dropping a bogus bankruptcy story that could’ve blown up in our faces. Stuff like that, plus bosses who actually walk the walk, makes it stick.
Vikram: That’s actually a killer example. The Gita even says: whatever the big dogs do, everyone else copies. So if we’re strict about fact-checking, the whole team falls in line. Veda, any ideas on keeping these standards up when the news cycle’s spinning out of control?
Veda: Yeah, checks and balances, for sure. Maybe have someone specifically in charge of ethics—like a referee for big stories. Or set up a tracker to see how often we have to run corrections. Could even shout out reporters who take the time to get things right. But what if the top brass is breathing down our necks to get a story out ASAP?
Vikram: Right where the Gita drops the mic. If you’re leading, you’ve gotta hold the line—even if the execs want speed over accuracy. Just show them the receipts: like, 60% of people don’t trust the news ‘cause stories get rushed and facts get fudged. Ethical leadership means having the guts to say, “We’ll run it when it’s ready, not just to be first.” Stick to dharma—do what’s right, even if it’s a pain.
Sowndarawali: Exactly. My buddy at another channel got pressured to blast out this half-baked celebrity mess. She stood her ground, checked everything, and the story actually held up later. The Gita’s basically screaming, “Set the example or everyone’s gonna cut corners.” If we start slacking, the whole ship starts sinking and nobody trusts us.
Vikram: Couldn’t agree more. The Gita isn’t just about ticking boxes—it’s about making people want to do the right thing. When we set the bar high, the team steps up, and our newsroom actually becomes trustworthy.
Veda: So, really, it’s about building a vibe where ethics isn’t optional, and there are tools to help everyone do the right thing. The Gita’s kinda giving us the cheat codes for this stuff.
Sowndarawali: Couldn’t have said it better. If we all act like the Gita’s “great person,” we’re not just chasing stories—we’re shaping what people believe. Let’s chase the truth, not just the clicks.
Vikram: You two nailed it. The Gita’s advice here? Lead with integrity, ‘cause everyone’s watching—and following—what we do.
Sowndarawali (with a wise grin): “In a world racing for clicks, the Gita reminds us: Be the truth you want to report.”
Comments are closed.