The Art of Distinguishing Right from Wrong

by V C Bharathi

Vidura Niti, a significant discussion from the Mahabharata’s Udyoga Parva (Chapters 33-40). Vidura Niti is perhaps most celebrated for its content on moral and practical instruction. Vidura Niti provides lessons on everything from leadership, self-care, and discernment, the ability to use your reason to be able to decide what is right or wrong. The Vidura outlines a primary principle of discernment: the golden rule of ethical behavior remains shockingly relevant to today’s, both personal and corporate life. 

Vidura Niti (Udyoga Parva, Chapter 33, Verse 61):

Sanskrit Verse: 

न तत्परस्य संनादति प्रतिकूलं यदात्मनः।

 संग्रहेणैव संनादति धर्मः स्यात्कामादन्यः॥

Transliteration: 

Na tatparasya sannādati pratikūlaṃ yadātmanaḥ |

 Saṅgraheṇaiva sannādati dharmaḥ syātkāmādanyaḥ ||

English Translation: 

“Do not do to others what is disagreeable to yourself. In brief, this is dharma (righteousness). Anything else arises from desire.”

This verse encapsulates the definition of discernment by appealing to the audience’s empathy and intellect as a moral compass. Vidura even says that one should refrain from doing anything to others that one would not want done to oneself. This principle, which is based on reciprocity, is part of the definition of righteousness (dharma) and warns one about acting based on self-interested desires, which can cloud one’s judgment.

At its heart, this verse speaks to an ethical generalization: the Golden Rule. By asking us to contemplate how an action affects others through our own experience, Vidura has reinforced empathy as a way to make an ethical distinction. The intellect must evaluate whether an action falls within the range of dharma or is propelled by ephemeral desires (kāma), which can lead to deployed action. As Vidura states “in brief,” the foundation of the principle is simple but deep – discernment is about, not complicated rules, but rather, about applying an instinctive position on basic fairness and righteousness. 

This teaching is valuable because it is cultural and time-less. It asks us to be aware of ourselves and our need to distinguish one from the other, suggesting that we move beyond our wants and preferences. By framing decisions in terms of empathy and intellect, Vidura offers a guide for ethical conduct that is useful and universal.

In today’s accelerated, interconnected world, discernment is more important than ever before. A person faces unlimited decisions in a day, whether that is in terms of personal interactions or consideration for society at large. Vidura’s verse provides an eternal guide for making these choices. For example, when we are assessing our relationship with others, exercising this principle means considering the potential impact that our words or actions may have on others. Before hurling a verbal assault, or recklessly taking an action that may require repentance, one might consider asking oneself, “Would I want to be treated in this way?” Such contemplation invites compassion and reduces conflicts in the future while aligning one’s actions with righteousness.

In addition, with the digital age and the influence that social media has on the amplification of one’s voice or actions, discernment becomes even more important. While it may seem commonplace to share a divisive post or to engage in a quarrel on social media, one could argue that it represents a challenge of desire to be validated or recognized by peers. Vidura’s verse provides a profound reminder: we must first assess whether or not our social media behavior utilizes the same empathy we expect from others. Moreover, Vidura recommends that we use our words in a way that fosters positivity and does not promote harm in the online world; therefore embodying dharma in our online behaviour.

 This idea of discernment relates to more global issues too. For instance, during civil society campaigns for environmental policies or social justice, Vidura’s verse is a reminder to reflect on how our decisions may also affect others—especially generations to come.  Discernment is present through cognitive reasoning, intention, and empathy, so we may driven toward sustainable and just solutions, making sure we do nothing to cause harm we would not be willing to inflict on ourselves.

In the business context, Vidura’s principle is particularly relevant to ensure ethical conduct and responsible leadership with a potential impact beyond the enterprise. The business landscape is rife with dilemmas in which the desires of profit set themselves at odds with ethics. Vidura’s verse encourages leaders to consider the implications of their decision-making processes in terms of reciprocity: “If we were the stakeholder ship and knowing the consequences of our decisions, would we accept them?”   

Take the example of an organization that makes consumer goods. For the sake of cutting costs, an organization may consider utilizing lesser quality materials, but Vidura’s counsel would have leaders consider: “Would we want to use a product that compromised safety or quality?” Acknowledging this option could lead to ethical standards first, which in turn may build the respective trust of a brand and customer loyalty.   

In technology, for instance, an organization rightly thinks about the privacy and protection of personal data. At the same time, leaders should find ways to consider if they would feel okay for their own personal data to be mishandled or mismanaged. With times of the analysis of data, this could lead to policies that respect the rights of users, in alignment with the communication of dharma.  

Within the context of corporate governance, Vidura’s principle is a way to support an ethical culture in the workplace. Leaders can model discernment by making sure that workplace policies, such as promotions or allocation of resources, are fair. For example, a person uses their judgment in performance reviews or promotion processes by considering, “Would I feel this process was fair if I was being reviewed?” In this way of promoting best practices, it can ensure justness and transparency, motivate employees, and put a dent in overcoming distrust in organizations.

There’s also guidance in the verse for resolving conflict. When negotiating or dealing with internal team conflict one can use discernment in that they do not act on their own ego or on power. By insisting on fairness in that no party must accept treatment that they themselves would not accept. Managers build collaboration and innovation, which drive corporate success, when they insist on fairness.

There are also challenges to applying Vidura’s principle of discernment that require overcoming the desire for instant gratification. In today’s world, we experience mini instant gratifications in our desires for recognition, wealth, or convenience which can bias our judgement. Mindfulness practices such as journaling your reflections or meditation can help you to pause and reflect before making a choice. In the corporate context, having mandatory ethical checks, by using regulations such as an independent audit or discussion with stakeholders help ensure that decisions are based on dharma and not on the personal desire for rewards.

Training can also help to create discernment. Programs that stimulate ethical dilemmas with a workshop that required employees to use Vidura’s principle to resolve dilemmas can help build a culture that promotes integrity. Making it a practice to reward ethical behavior and to follow up on incidents quickly will shape this mode of discernment into a habit.

Vidura’s verse is a primer on moral discernment that fuses compassion with intelligent engagement of life’s complexities. Vidura’s verse encourages us to move forward with care and consideration, but in our most personal spaces it benefits us to think about decisions in ways that support kind, reflective decisions to manifest smart choices in our relationships and our choices as engaged citizens. In business, Vidura offers opportunities for leaders to shape ethical companies and sustainability, where growth is sacrificed for ethical company practices and fairness does not come at the expense of efficiency. As we navigate the complexities of our current moment – digital ethics, corporate responsibility; Vidura summons us to a more epochal landscape. It is Vidura’s question, “Would I take this for myself?” that renews our commitment to structure our actions around righteousness and ensure our actions benefit both the individual and the public. This is a very old idea that patterns our path to a measured, just world and reminds us that true discernment is not bound in time.

“Embrace Vidura’s Wisdom: Discern Right from Wrong with Empathy and Intellect!”

Comments are closed.